The coal town story

The James V. Brown Library will screening a film by local filmmaker Martin J. Hula tonight in its theater/meeting Lowry Room on the third floor of the new Welch wing at 6:30pm tonight Thursday November 21, 2013. The film, “Life in a Coal Mining Town, is a great piece of work,” says Shawn Newcomer of the library staff. “Highly recommended!”

From the library’s website: ”

Area resident Martin J. Hula will present his documentary memoir “Life in a Coal Town” and display his memorabilia. He will also discuss his novel “The Coal Picker.”

Coal mining has left an indelible imprint on Pennsylvania history. From the anthracite region in the east to the bituminous mines in the west, coal affected the growth of Pennsylvania’s economy, development of towns and, of course, the people who lived in them. Some may be familiar films such as The Molly Maguires and Matewan that depict the harsh realities of living in a coal mining town, but local resident Martin J. Hula lived it growing up in the western Pennsylvania town of Marstella, or Moss Creek as the residents referred to it after the nearby stream.

This stark portrayal of the hardships of the people of Moss Creek is incredibly moving and enlightening and should be seen by anyone who lives and works in Pennsylvania now. From the dangers of the mines to the tyranny of the company store, this is a tale not to be missed.”

Antebellum cinema


12 Years a Slave: The film validated my feelings about today’s race relations in the US. It provides a contextual basis to understand racial dynamics in the 21st Century. It explains, inadvertently, the reasons for racial animus in today’s American political, cultural and social scenes.

In preparation for viewing the film, I also viewed Birth of a Nation (1915) and Gone with Wind (1939). The romanticism of southern nobility was stripped away and the brutality was revealed like never before. 12 Years is just a small part of the American Holocaust, there is much more to be told, but a 133 minute film is limited. (Birth of a Nation was 3 hours, and Gone with the Wind 4 hours) Granted, the mini-series ROOTS, played on the ABC network for a week in 1977, but the images of brutality were suppressed for the TV audience. For instance, the scars on Kinte’s back was not as dreadful as the whipping scars in 12 Years. In the name of conceptual balance, more black protagonists are needed in American cinema. Perhaps a 4-hour epic of Nat Turner’s rebellion, or a 3-hour saga of Harriet Tubman’s family might be in the works. Who knows?

Technically the film was superb. Considering that the slave’s point of view has never been told before in a major US motion picture, filming in Louisiana shows real progress that the south is ready to deal with its past honestly.

In terms of content, I was expecting more gore. But thank God that didn’t happen. I absolutely love Michael Fassbinder in this film. I was convinced that he was a raving madman. Interestingly, I did not hate him as the film’s most culpable villain, the system itself was on trail and rightly earned my disgust.

The earlier films mentioned here were more sympathetic to Southerners. Whites were portrayed as victims who had lost the American equivalent of a classical civilization. 12 Years gives us a new perspective, that of the slave. In the same way Kirk Douglas’ Spartacus (1960) reveals Rome’s corruption and excesses, McQueen’s 12 Years a Slave presents the quiet heroic efforts of Solomon Northup to stay alive in a world gone mad.

Some of my friends are reticent about seeing the movie. Some want to see it in the privacy of their homes so that they may weep in great anguish. I can’t fault them for that. It is a powerful film that will evoke uncomfortable feelings of sadness. But I suggest that most folks can see the film in the theater. McQueen shows us the brutal truth the same way Spielberg gave us the horrors of the Holocaust in Schindler’s List (1993) … just enough to make us feel uneasy.

The telling of the American Holocaust has started. I hope more films of this quality are on their way.

More gun play in PG-13’s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since the tragedy in Newtown Connecticut last year, Gun Control and the role, if any, that popular media contributes to gun violence has been hot topics in the news. Some observers say that there has been an uptick in gun violence in the last few years. It certainly seems that we are experiencing more mass shootings.

A new study says that movies rated as PG-13 – that is movies aimed at teens – are more violent than R rated movies. So what do you think? Are young people being exposed to more gun violence in movies? If that is true, does more guns in movies make teens more aggressive? For more about the recent study by Ohio State University, VU (Vrije Universiteit) University Amsterdam in The Netherlands and the University of Pennsylvania, click here.

Coincidentally, when a crazed gunman shot up a movie theater in Aurora Colorado, the movie The Dark Knight Rises was playing. It had a PG-13 rating.